Sex.com Lawsuit Erupts, Kremen ‘Not Involved’

PHILADELPHIA — According to a report in the Philadelphia Inquirer this morning, a group calling itself Sex.com Incorporated that recently tried to buy the domain Sex.com is suing a Boston-based domain registrar for allegedly bilking them out of $500,000 in a deal to buy the famed web address.

The case does not involve Gary Kremen, the well-known entrepreneur who still technically owns the site.

Kremen told XBiz he recently had several individuals, including officials at Boston-based Domain Name Acquisition Group (DNAG) and Deal Jam, put in an option to buy Sex.com, which is estimated to be worth around $11 million. Kremen said they in turn sold the address to an undisclosed buyer, taking a $500,000 deposit on the purchase.

“I had some guys buy an option, kind of like you put a deposit on a house,” Kremen said. “I thought they were going to develop it, but they didn’t. They just tried to resell it.”

Details on the deal are sketchy, and nobody but Kremen was willing to talk about the case, but the attorney for the plaintiff told reporters earlier today that DNAG had failed to disclose valuable information to his client prior to the deposit.

“[DNAG engaged in] repeated untruths regarding the domain name Sex.com, about other competing offers for the domain name Sex.com and various other material and relevant exaggerations and untruths,” he said.

Kremen, who is not named in the lawsuit, said the whole issue has nothing to do with him. The lawsuit names DMAG, Andrew Miller, Peter Hubsham, and Deal Jam as defendants in the case.

“This is entirely a third-party thing,” he said.

Kremen said the individuals at DMAG and Deal Jam who originally optioned to buy Sex.com still have the right to do so, though that option is expiring soon.

“This only shows maybe I didn’t pick a good partner to sell it too,” he said. “If they decide to not exercise their option, then it’s still for sale.”

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

NYC Adult Businesses Seek SCOTUS Appeal in Zoning Case

Attorneys representing a group of New York City adult businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Teasy Agency Launches Marketing Firm

Teasy Agency has officially launched Teasy Marketing firm.

Ofcom Investigates More Sites in Wake of AV Traffic Shifts

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into 20 more adult sites as part of its age assurance enforcement program under the Online Safety Act.

MintStars Launches Debit Card for Creators

MintStars has launched its MintStars Creator Card, powered by Payy.

xHamster Settles Texas AV Lawsuit, Pays $120,000

Hammy Media, parent company of xHamster, has settled a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law, agreeing to pay a $120,000 penalty.

RevealMe Joins Pineapple Support as Partner-Level Sponsor

RevealMe has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

OnlyFans Institutes Criminal Background Checks for US Creators

OnlyFans will screen creators in the United States for criminal convictions, CEO Keily Blair has announced in a post on LinkedIn.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Healthier Relationships' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group on enhancing connection and personal growth.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pornhub, Stripchat: VLOP Designation Based on Flawed Data

In separate cases, attorneys for Pornhub and Stripchat this week told the EU’s General Court that the European Commission relied on unreliable data when it classified the sites as “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) under the EU’s Digital Services Act, news organization MLex reports.

Show More