Sexual Harassment Standard Shifts

SAN FRANCISCO – The umbrella covering sexual harassment got a little wider this week, following a recent ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that sexual harassment can be proven even if the harassing in question wasn’t motivated by sex.

The decision stems from a lawsuit brought on by three Alaskan employees of the National Education Association in 2001. The suit alleged Carol Christopher, Julie Bhend and Carmela Chamara endured repeated verbal and physical abuse from Thomas Harvey, then the union's assistant executive director in Alaska and now its executive director in the state.

Originally, a federal judge in Alaska rejected the sexual harassment claims, saying there was no evidence that Harvey acted out of bias against women.

But Senior Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, writing for the appellate court, said there was evidence that the women were subjected to “frequent, profane, and often public” tirades, enough to infer that Harvey treated men and women differently, and creating what one male employee testified was “general fear” on the part of the women. Evidence included testimony from various staff members who said Harvey often yelled at the women and made threatening physical gestures, including grabbing their shoulders and shaking his fists at them.

Two of the women have since resigned, attributing their resignations to Harvey.

“This will potentially be a highly beneficial ruling for people filing harassment claims,” attorney John Stiller, an expert in gender discrimination suits, told XBiz. “It’s basically saying that the effects of harassment are more important than the reasons behind it.”

Goodwin said the final decision in such matters should be left to a jury, sending the case, Christopher v. National Education Association No. 04-35029, back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, which originally dismissed the suit.

“Abuse in the workplace directed at women, whether or not it is motivated by ‘lust’ or by a desire to drive women out of the organization, can violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” Goodwin wrote. “Offensive conduct that is not sex-specific nonetheless may violate Title VII if there is sufficient circumstantial evidence of differences in the harassment suffered by female and male employees.”

A retrial date has not been set.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Goddess Lilith Launches 'Adultpreneurs' Networking Site

Goddess Lilith has launched Adultpreneurs, a new community and networking site.

Leilani Li, Arson Leigh Star in Latest From Kink.com

Leilani Li and Arson Leigh star with Baxxx in the latest release from Kink.com's KinkTrans studio brand, titled "Open Your Hole, Fuckmeat!"

Adult Venue Marketplace 'FckSpace' Launches

The adult venue marketplace FckSpace has officially launched.

Chloe Amour, Katerina Karson Topline 'Mom's Lesbian Lover'

Chloe Amour and Katerina Karson headline "Mom’s Lesbian Lover," from Girlfriends Films.

Freya Von Doom Leads Latest From TeamSkeet

Freya Von Doom stars with Juan Largo in a new scene for TeamSkeet’s “Freaky Fembots” series.

Brazzers Premieres Limited Series 'The Three Fucks of Christmas'

Brazzers has released the first installment of its new limited series, "The Three Fucks of Christmas."

Elise London Performs 1st Girl/Girl in Latest From Girlsway

Elise London has performed her first girl/girl scene opposite Lilibet Saunders in the latest Girlsway release, titled “Spooned by StepMommy.”

Proxy Paige Drops New Evil Angel Release With Siswet

Siswet stars in a new Proxy Paige-helmed Evil Angel scene.

Selina Bentz Makes Her New Sensations Debut

Selina Bentz has made her New Sensations debut, starring alongside Gunnar Bishop.

Florida Attorney General Dismisses AV Suit Against Segpay

The Florida attorney general’s office on Monday agreed to dismiss claims against payment processor Segpay in a lawsuit over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law.

Show More