Sexual Harassment Standard Shifts

SAN FRANCISCO – The umbrella covering sexual harassment got a little wider this week, following a recent ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that sexual harassment can be proven even if the harassing in question wasn’t motivated by sex.

The decision stems from a lawsuit brought on by three Alaskan employees of the National Education Association in 2001. The suit alleged Carol Christopher, Julie Bhend and Carmela Chamara endured repeated verbal and physical abuse from Thomas Harvey, then the union's assistant executive director in Alaska and now its executive director in the state.

Originally, a federal judge in Alaska rejected the sexual harassment claims, saying there was no evidence that Harvey acted out of bias against women.

But Senior Judge Alfred T. Goodwin, writing for the appellate court, said there was evidence that the women were subjected to “frequent, profane, and often public” tirades, enough to infer that Harvey treated men and women differently, and creating what one male employee testified was “general fear” on the part of the women. Evidence included testimony from various staff members who said Harvey often yelled at the women and made threatening physical gestures, including grabbing their shoulders and shaking his fists at them.

Two of the women have since resigned, attributing their resignations to Harvey.

“This will potentially be a highly beneficial ruling for people filing harassment claims,” attorney John Stiller, an expert in gender discrimination suits, told XBiz. “It’s basically saying that the effects of harassment are more important than the reasons behind it.”

Goodwin said the final decision in such matters should be left to a jury, sending the case, Christopher v. National Education Association No. 04-35029, back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, which originally dismissed the suit.

“Abuse in the workplace directed at women, whether or not it is motivated by ‘lust’ or by a desire to drive women out of the organization, can violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” Goodwin wrote. “Offensive conduct that is not sex-specific nonetheless may violate Title VII if there is sufficient circumstantial evidence of differences in the harassment suffered by female and male employees.”

A retrial date has not been set.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Madison Ivy Returns to Brazzers

Madison Ivy has returned to Brazzers alongside studio exclusive Girthmasterr in "The Boss is Back."

Ivy Ireland Toplines Jonni Darkko's 'Anal Size Queens 2'

Ivy Ireland headlines the second volume of director Jonni Darkko's "Anal Size Queens," from Evil Angel.

Juliana Marie, Thea Summers Lead Latest From TeamSkeet

Juliana Marie and Thea Summers star with Jayden Marcos in the latest release from TeamSkeet's "Reptyle Labs" series.

Tiffani Time Stars in Latest From Kink.com

Tiffani Time stars with Nicolas Ryder in the latest installment of Kink.com's "Divine Bitches" series, titled "Power Fucked."

Kazumi Partners With Rose in Good Faith to Release 'V-Mule' Vulva-Shaped Footwear

Multi-XMAs winner Kazumi has teamed up with fashion brand Rose in Good Faith to release V-Mule vulva-shaped footwear.

SWR Data Publishes 'Clip Trend' Report

Adult industry market research outfit SWR Data has published a report on the performance of clip platforms and sales.

Another German Court Rejects Blocking Orders Against Pornhub, YouPorn

A German court has blocked the Rhineland-Palatinate Media Authority (MA RLP) from forcing telecom providers based within the court’s jurisdiction to cut off access to Aylo-owned adult sites Pornhub and YouPorn.

Cubbi Thompson Leads Latest From New Sensations

Cubbi Thompson stars with Codey Steele in the latest release from New Sensations.

Ofcom Fines Kick Online Entertainment $1 Million for AV Noncompliance

U.K. media regulator Ofcom on Thursday fined Kick Online Entertainment 800,000 pounds (more than $1 million) for failing to implement age checks as required for compliance with the Online Safety Act.

Show More