educational

Database Encryption

The optimal way to store adult content is through the use of a relational database. A relational database provides more security than simply leaving content as OS files for a hacker to download. Yet in today’s hostile online environment, intruders have learned how to steal database files and extract their data. Therefore a relational database is not secure in itself as a repository of content.

Relational databases store data as large database files. Although the information is hard to retrieve as a whole, one can FTP these files and, with a simple text editor, figure out patterns that will yield data such as credit card numbers, customer information and passwords.

If you are storing graphics in your relational database, such as binary large objects, this information is harder to steal. Yet anyone who obtained a data file of your binary object database could figure out the offsets and recreate the binary images using a simple program.

Theft of relational data is simple because the data is stored in table format in its original form. Your valuable data is simply sitting in a structure to be retrieved quickly and related to other items.

The only way to protect content in a relational database is to encrypt the data. When you encrypt data, you change its form into useless unreadable data. Later, with a password key, you can decrypt the data and restore it to its original valuable form.

There are basically three software strategies to encrypting relational data. The first strategy is to encrypt your operating system files. This usually involves a hardware solution to stream all file I/O in encrypted format. This option usually is the most expensive.

The second strategy is to purchase a relational database where encryption is built into the database engine. In this case the relational database translates the SQL statements and data inputs into encrypted format. When data is written to the disk, it appears as junk. When again this data is retrieved, the database engine decrypts the data blocks so the data appears in its original form.

The drawbacks of the above strategy are that it does not necessarily include a good methodology of granting users rights on encrypted data, nor does it imply a strategy to audit access to encrypted data, and finally, there is no solution to key management. Key management is the storage of keys (passwords) in the relational database.

The third solution is to purchase software that installs itself on your relational database and encrypts schemas, tables and columns. The software solution is slower but less expensive usually. The software will probably employ the use of views to decrypt data and the use of triggers to encrypt data. The software solution must also incorporate a well thought out key-management strategy, as does the database solution.

Key Management
Key management is critical to database encryption. How do you store the passwords (keys) to the encrypted data? If you store this information in the database, then someone can steal the encryption keys using FTP and you have a useless solution. Therefore, unless you are using hardware encryption that stores the algorithms in hardware, you need to consider key management.

The most obvious solution that is used to store keys in a database is to encrypt these keys also using internal software algorithms. In this case, a hacker could steal all your data files and not be able to retrieve the password keys that would allow them to decrypt valuable content.

Another solution to key management is to store the keys on a removable device, such as on a floppy disk. Whenever a user needs to view your database data, the user must first load the keys from the floppy into your encryption key-management system. This solution is obviously not practical for online content, but for credit card and customer information, using a removable device is the safest solution.

The drawback to encrypting your content is twofold. In the first place, database encryption is not simply clicking a button. Encryption needs to be planned in the same way we plan database design. A strategy of what data to encrypt and which users have access to encrypted data will require time to create and implement.

The second drawback to encryption is, of course, performance. Whenever a valid user retrieves your content, the data has to be decrypted into its original form. In the case of even a small graphical file, this will take CPU time to decrypt each block of data.

Most encryption algorithms, such as AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), will encrypt data in 16-, 24- and 32-byte increments. So for example, when a valid user requests a sexually explicit graphical image in your database, this image has to be decrypted recursively and quickly during the SQL query that delivers the data to your customer.

More CPU Usage
Encryption will thus increase CPU usage on your database or web server. Yet the good news is that most servers are bound by disk usage, therefore if you have fast multiprocessing machines, the increased overhead for encryption can be minimal.

The biggest slowdown to encryption is poor planning. If you encrypt your primary keys or other fields that users search on, then a user query will become very slow unless you have planned to encrypt the search string before it is evaluated by the SQL statement. Remember, the indexes of your database also will be encrypted since they mirror your data.

One solution around the problems of index encryption is the use of bitmap/hash indexes. With bitmap indexes, the data is decrypted, meaning it is not as safe, yet the data is stored in bitmap format by your database vendor, which is very difficult to translate back into worthwhile data.

Regardless of which encryption solution you chose, you eventually will choose one. In the future, people will laugh at the early business of the 21st century and how valuable data and content was left sitting open on hard drives that were accessible to the Internet.

James Edwards is an independent Oracle software developer. He can be reached at relationalwizard@aol.com.

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

Why the Right Merchant Category Code Matters for NSFW AI Businesses

You explained exactly what your NSFW AI business does to your payment processor and they seemed to get it. The underwriting process felt thorough and exhausting, but it was well worth it because you began processing.

Jonathan Corona ·
trends

How Local Payments Can Expand Access and Reduce Friction at Checkout

Global adult platforms often enter new markets with a familiar assumption: If their checkout accepts major cards, they're ready for local customers. In reality, payment habits vary widely by country. Dutch consumers use iDEAL for online shopping, BLIK is a leading e-commerce payment method in Poland, and India's UPI handles billions of transactions each month.

Mitch Platt ·
opinion

How Detailed Receipts Build Consumer Trust and Reduce Chargeback

When was the last time you bought something online? Chances are you looked for the confirmation almost immediately. Did the transaction go through? Does it show what you bought? Were you charged correctly? And if there's a problem, who can you contact?

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

What Adult Platforms Should Know About the EU AI Act

The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act is now largely in force, creating new obligations for adult platforms using AI for content creation, performer verification, age estimation, moderation and other functions.

Corey Silverstein ·
opinion

How Native Spanish Speakers Help Pleasure Brands Expand Across Latin America

Latin America's Spanish-speaking markets represent an exciting growth opportunity for the pleasure products industry. Across the region, conversations about sexual wellness are becoming more open, specialty retailers are expanding their assortments and shoppers are seeking products that reflect their lifestyles and values.

Rin Musick ·
opinion

Why Retail Expertise Is Essential When AI Tools Analyze Store Data

Somewhere in one of our stores, someone scanned a barcode into a quantity field. The number entered was 8,388,607. At $19.99 per unit, that made a single line item worth roughly $167 million. The number was so large that the import failed immediately.

Zondre Watson ·
profile

Vendo CEO Mitch Platt Reflects on 20 Years of Lessons and Evolution

More than 20 years ago, three entrepreneurs in Barcelona began gathering over beers to pitch, dissect and routinely destroy one another's business ideas. The ritual was simple: One person arrived with a concept, while the other two tried to expose every weakness. Any proposal that survived earned another look. Most did not.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

How to Avoid the Hidden Risks of AI-Generated Legal Documents

Artificial intelligence can write a contract in seconds, but that does not mean it can write the contract your business actually needs. Across the adult industry, operators, creators and producers are increasingly using generative AI to prepare model releases, performer agreements, privacy policies, takedown notices, employment documents and responses to regulators. The appeal is obvious: Legal work is expensive, AI is fast and the resulting document often looks impressively professional. That polished appearance is exactly what makes the practice dangerous.

Corey Silverstein ·
opinion

How Rolling Reserves Affect Cash Flow and Merchant Stability

You log in to your payment processor’s dashboard, discover they are withholding 10% of your sales, and immediately assume something has gone wrong. In reality, everything is working exactly as intended.

Jonathan Corona ·
opinion

What Federal Age Verification Could Mean for Adult Websites

Our industry has grappled with a patchwork of confusing and burdensome state age verification laws for the past couple of years. But that landscape could change quickly after the House passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act (H.R. 7757) by a vote of 267-117, marking a significant federal step into this space.

Lawrence G. Walters ·
Show More