educational

Chargebacks: Hooray for Mastercard

Master-Card has recently published a revision of its standards for the Excessive Chargeback Program that will go into effect on Aug. 15. In plain English, that means that the chargeback ratios at which your MasterCard account is evaluated at have been modified.

As a reminder, the chargeback ratio is calculated by MasterCard as the number of Master-Card chargebacks received for a merchant in a calendar month divided by the number of the merchant’s MasterCard sales transactions in the preceding month.

Although the chargeback thresholds have changed, the calculation of the fines is still the same but using the 1.5 percent rate instead of the 1 percent rate.

They have also defined “Merchant” as any distinct merchant location, whether a merchant’s physical location or a merchant’s Internet site or URL, that is identified by a distinct billing descriptor.

MasterCard monitors possible troubled Merchants at two levels. The first level is identified as the Chargeback-Monitored Merchants. In the past Merchants were classified as CMM when their chargeback ratios were in excess of 0.5 percent and at least 50 chargebacks. The revised ratio has doubled to a new benchmark of in excess of 1 percent and at least 100 chargebacks in a calendar month.

The second level of merchant classification is that of the Excessive Chargeback Merchant (ECM). To be defined as an ECM the merchant formerly needed to have a minimum of 1 percent and at least 50 chargebacks in each of two consecutive calendar months. The revised definition is that the merchant would need to have a minimum chargeback ratio of 1.5 percent and at least 100 chargebacks in each of two calendar months. Once a merchant is classified as an ECM, the merchant will need to achieve a chargeback ratio of less than 1.5 percent for two consecutive months to be removed from that identification.

Although the chargeback thresholds have changed, the calculation of the fines is still the same but using the 1.5 percent rate instead of the 1 percent rate.

This revision to the MasterCard Excessive Chargeback Program is welcome news as so often what Merchants experience is the threat, and the practice, of these rule makers lowering thresholds to show progress towards improving the networks they represent.

Although this revision to the rules provides each Merchant with a greater amount of allowed Chargebacks on their account, I continue to stress the importance of eliminating fraudulent and questionable transactions to keep your account compliant. As consumers will continue to try to get what they can for free using whatever means are available to them, including claiming fraud, a merchant has to be actively engaged in the pursuit of questionable transactions.

I look forward to the day when the consumer is held accountable to their claims of fraud and unauthorized transactions that they make falsely or at least to the day that we can all take a snapshot of the buyer so that we can show exactly who made the purchase! Until that day, hooray for MasterCard!

Related:  

Copyright © 2026 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More Articles

opinion

How Adult Businesses Can Navigate Global Compliance Demands

The internet has made the world feel small. Case in point: Adult websites based in the U.S. are now getting letters from regulators demanding compliance with foreign laws, even if they don’t operate in those countries. Meanwhile, some U.S. website operators dealing with the patchwork of state-level age verification laws have considered incorporating offshore in the hopes of avoiding these new obligations — but even operators with no physical presence in the U.S. have been sued or threatened with claims for not following state AV laws.

Larry Walters ·
opinion

Top Tips for Bulletproof Creator Management Contracts

The creator management business is booming. Every week, it seems, a new agency emerges, promising to turn creators into stars, automate their fan interactions or triple their revenue through “secret” social strategies. The reality? Many of these agencies are operating with contracts that wouldn’t survive a single serious dispute — if they even have contracts at all.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Building Sustainable Revenue Without Opt-Out Cross-Sales

Over the past year, we’ve seen growing pushback from acquirers on merchants using opt-out cross-sales — also known as negative option offers. This has been especially noticeable in the U.S. In fact, one of our acquirers now declines new merchants during onboarding if an opt-out flow is detected. Existing merchants submitting new URLs with opt-out cross-sales are being asked to remove them.

Cathy Beardsley ·
trends

How to Handle Payment Disputes Without Sacrificing Trust

You can run the best-managed and most compliant website out there, but that still doesn’t completely shield you from the risks tied to payment disputes. Buyer’s remorse, an unclear billing description or even a simple misunderstanding can lead a customer to dispute a transaction. Accumulate enough disputes, and both your reputation and revenue could be at risk.

Jonathan Corona ·
trends

WIA Profile: Taylor Moore

With a 70-person team and a growing slate of tools for content creators, the Teasy Agency has developed a reputation for putting talent first. That commitment owes a lot to co-founder Taylor Moore’s own experiences as a cam model.

Jackie Backman ·
profile

WIA Profile: Cathy Turns Creator Platform Experience Into a Model-First Playbook

As both a model and industry executive, Cathy lives in two worlds at once. “Since I do both things, I can act as the liaison between the model community and the rest of the SextPanther team,” she tells XBIZ.

Jackie Backman ·
opinion

From Compliance to Confidence: The Future of Safety in Adult Platforms

In numerous countries and U.S. states, laws now require platforms to prevent minors from accessing age-inappropriate material. But the need for safeguarding doesn’t end with age verification. Today’s online landscape also places adult companies at uniquely high risk for inadvertently facilitating exploitation, abuse or reputational harm, or of being accused of doing so.

Andy Lulham ·
opinion

What Adult Businesses Need to Know About Florida's Age Verification Law

The rise and proliferation of age verification laws has changed the landscape for the online adult industry. A recent and compelling example is the state of Florida, where Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed multiple complaints against major platforms as well as affiliates accused of violating the state’s AV law.

Corey D. Silverstein ·
opinion

Maintaining Brand Trust in the Face of Negative Press

Over the last year, several of our merchants have found themselves caught up in litigation over compliance with state age verification laws. Recently, Segpay itself was pulled into the spotlight, facing scrutiny over Florida’s AV statute, HB 3. These stories inevitably get picked up by both industry and mainstream news outlets.

Cathy Beardsley ·
opinion

How to Switch Payment Processors Without Disrupting Business

For many merchants, the idea of switching payment processors can feel pretty overwhelming. That’s understandable. After all, downtime can stall sales, recurring subscriptions can suddenly fail, or compliance gaps can put accounts at risk. Operating in a high-risk sector like the adult industry can further amplify the stress of transition.

Jonathan Corona ·
Show More