Prenda Law’s Strategy at 9th Circuit Baffles Legal Peers

PASADENA, Calif. — After three appellate judges ripped into Prenda Law’s “operation” at a court hearing Monday, the notorious law firm’s counsel continued moving full steam ahead, claiming to the panel that its principals weren’t part of a “crooked extortion” scheme, as one judge described it.

Prenda Law, which disbanded shortly after U.S. District Judge Otis Wright accused it of operating a "porno-trolling collective" and handed out steep contempt sanctions in May 2013, now awaits a ruling that most legal experts say won’t favor the firm' former partners.

The “operation,” as Judge Harry Pregerson of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals put it on Monday, involved Prenda Law principals purchasing a number of adult film copyrights, seeding a bit torrent network with films and waiting for the infringing porn fans to take the bait.

Prenda Law attorneys John Steele, Paul Duffy and Paul Hansmeier later were able to convince a number of federal judges to subpoena the records of the ISPs and name infringers with their exact addresses.

Thousands of legal demand letters asked the unwitting targets to cough up $3,400 for the copyright infringement offenses, but lawsuits were nil to rare.

And, Pregerson noted, the letters kept on going out despite the subpoenas ordered quashed.

"They used our court system for illegal purposes to extort money; they used our discovery system,” said Pregerson, calling Prenda Law’s sole litigation work an “ingenious, crooked, extortionate operation.”

The scheme began to unravel when Prenda Law ended up in front of Wright, the federal judge, who found evidence of forgery involving the copyright signatory for the porn films. That signatory, Alan Cooper, was the caretaker of a rural cabin owned by Steele.

Wright asked Prenda Law attorneys to explain the firm’s method of operation in the copyright cases, and they all plead the fifth, which not only triggered $81,000 in civil sanctions but possible criminal sanctions, including incarceration.

On appeal, it didn’t go well for Prenda Law on Monday.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — Judges Pregerson, Jacqueline Hong-Ngoc Nguyen and Richard Tallman — heard the firm’s appellate lawyer, Daniel Voelker of Chicago, attempt to focus on “prodecural flaws” in Wright’s courtroom.

But the panel stuck to their guns, as well as their deep-seated knowledge of the case, and demanded that Voelker address the accusations of misconduct Wright had focused on, including why the firm kept on sending out letters to fingered infringers after he had quashed subpoena orders.

The panel was particularly baffled that Prenda Law and its principals, through Voelker’s oral arguments, was seeking to have criminal contempt sanctions remanded to Wright's court for further procedural hearings, given that the maximum penalty for federal criminal contempt is life imprisonment.

"Is that they want, even if they're looking at a potential life in prison?" Tallman asked. 

"They want their day in court," Voelker said.

"This is going to be written about for years and years. … I don't know where this is going to end up,” Pregerson said. “If they really want to have a trial on this, with all protections of a criminal case — burden of proof, and a prosecutor, and all the rest of it — you sure they want that it?"

"They want their day in court," Voelker repeated.

Attorney Leonard J. French, an Allentown, Pa., litigator who’s been following the proceedings, said that two of the 9th Circuit judges referred to additional criminal investigation and “opening Pandora's Box if the case is remanded for further hearing.”

“The allegations that Prenda is a true copyright troll might be trumped by whatever is waiting inside that box,” French told XBIZ. “Prenda seemed to continue their 'full steam ahead' approach, with their attorney hammering the point that, when criminal sanctions are involved, additional due process must be followed, and that wasn't done here. 

“So, it appears the judges may remand for a full hearing on the issues not heard when Prenda took the fifth. Why in the world Prenda would think this is a good idea, I don't know.” 

Another attorney who has been following the case, Jeffery Lewis, an appellate law specialist with Rolling Hills Estates, Calif.-based Broedlow Lewis LLP, said the hearing, which was live streamed and available on YouTube, captured moments of amazement.

“Did you see when Prenda’s attorney argued there was no evidence of extortion in the appellate record? Judge Pregerson almost fell out of his chair,” Lewis said.

Lewis told XBIZ that he believes it’s likely that the “compensation” portion of the sanctions award, without any doubling, will be affirmed. 

Wright’s original sanction was at $81,000; however its bond in the proceedings, about $250,000, would go to defense attorney Morgan Pietz and a John Doe client named in a lawsuit that was dismissed by Prenda Law.

“The remainder of the award, doubled by Judge Wright, as a punitive sanction will likely be overturned,” Lewis said. “The panel left open the possibility that Prenda’s attorneys could face a criminal trial for contempt with the possibility of prison time. [It’s] theoretically possible, but not likely.”

The 9th Circuit panel on Monday did not indicate when they would decide the case.

A video of Monday's proceedings can be viewed here at 59:45.


Copyright © 2023 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Conservative Crusader Reveals Plan to Use Civil Lawsuits to Ban Adult Content Online

The leader of the American Principles Project (APP), a well-funded, anti-porn conservative lobby, said Wednesday that the ultimate aim of the age verification laws currently being passed in various states is to create a private right of action, so that parents could directly sue online companies if their children are able to access adult content.

Court Blocks California's Controversial 'Age-Appropriate Design Code Act'

A federal judge on Monday issued an injunction blocking the California attorney general from enforcing the controversial California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (CAADCA), which was passed last year after lobbying from a British baroness.

CAM4 Launches Creator Platform FAN5

CAM4 has launched its new subscription-based fan platform, FAN5.

Creators of Hentaied, Parasited Launch New Site 'Freeze'

Romero Mr. Alien, the creator of Parasited and Hentaied, has debuted a new site: Freeze.

UK Parliament Passes Controversial 'Online Safety Bill'

The U.K. Parliament on Tuesday passed the much-delayed Online Safety Bill, despite vocal criticisms by virtually all digital rights and free speech organizations and advocates.

Holly Randall's 'Unfiltered' YouTube Channel Reaches 250K Subscribers

Adult filmmaker/photographer Holly Randall's YouTube channel, "Holly Randall Unfiltered," has just surpassed 250,000 subscribers.

Industry Vets Launch Creator Management Outfit 'Consensual Creators'

Industry veterans Alana Evans, Dee Siren and Keke Banxx have teamed to launch Consensual Creators, a management and marketing company catering to content creators.

Chaturbate Hosting 3rd Annual 'Health and Wellness' Online Event

Chaturbate is hosting its third annual "Health and Wellness" event online on Monday, Sept. 25, with panels scheduled throughout the day.

FSC's Lotus Lain, April Flores Lead Consent Workshop at NSAC

Lotus Lain and April Flores of the Free Speech Coalition (FSC) led a workshop last month on intimacy coordination and consent at the National Sexual Assault Conference (NSAC) in San Francisco.

New Adult Cam Platform 'Chatmate' Debuts

New adult webcam platform Chatmate has launched.

Show More