Justices Decide to Take Up P2P Case

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court will rule on whether peer-to-peer file-sharing services can be held liable for copyright infringement.

The court on Friday agreed to hear the arguments of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studios vs. Grokster and StreamCast Networks. Other media companies involved on MGM's side of the case include The Walt Disney Co., Time Warner, News Corp.’s 20th Century Fox, General Electric's Universal Studios and Sony, among others.

The media companies claim file-sharing has cost them billions of dollars in lost sales and say the file-sharing companies enable people to trade music and video files of content they own in a way that "assists and facilitates" copyright infringement.

The case, which will be heard in the spring with a decision expected by June, is the latest in a long line of legal attacks by the media industry against companies that have built software to create file-sharing networks.

Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks Inc. provide free Internet-based conduits for users to swap computer files and are primarily used to exchange digital recordings of music and video. The companies make money off advertising on their websites.

The entertainment industry said in its Supreme Court appeal that a "resolution of the question presented here will largely determine the value, indeed the very significance of copyright in the digital era."

Grokster and StreamCast, in a countering legal brief, had urged the Supreme Court to reject the entertainment industry appeal. The two services argued that federal copyright law hasn't had the chance to catch up with new computer technologies such as the peer-to-peer services and that Congress was the right place solve problems arising from those services.

"Congress is itself in the midst of considering the very issue petitioners urge on this court," Grokster and StreamCast said in their brief. "The first of these is an omnibus copyright measure that combines several proposals intended to develop public copyright education programs and enhance penalties for direct infringers."

Grokster and StreamCast urged the Supreme Court to allow their services to continue operating because there are numerous legitimate uses for the file-sharing services that don't violate copyright laws.

Congressional action on copyright legislation can come no earlier than 2005 after the next Congress convenes in January.

The entertainment industry in 2001 sued the two services in a federal district court in California. There, a federal trial judge dismissed the case. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of handled the case on appeal.

A 9th Circuit panel ruled unanimously that Grokster and StreamCast face no secondary liability under federal law for copyright infringement.

A similar case in the The Netherlands in 2002 came out in favor of Sharman Networks, maker of file-sharing software Kazaa. The court there found that the company was not responsible for the behavior of its users.

The case is Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios vs. Grokster, 04-480.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Skinfluential Management's FansFuel Acquires Fanwire

FansFuel has acquired creator account management tool Fanwire.

Nebraska AV Bill Moves Forward Despite Privacy, Free Speech Concerns

Nebraska’s unicameral Legislature has given first-round approval to LB 1092, the state’s version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

AEBN Celebrates 25th Anniversary

The Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network (AEBN) is celebrating its 25th year in business this week.

Performers in Meta Blacklisting Lawsuit Seek to Preserve Antitrust Claims

Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby have informed a California court that, although they want to drop their lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, they may still pursue antitrust claims in the future.

FSC, Co-Plaintiffs to Ask US Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Texas Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and its co-plaintiffs in the challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law have petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to stay its recent decision upholding the law, because they intend to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the law’s constitutionality.

FSC Vows to Fight Florida Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has issued a statement vowing to continue fighting Florida’s new age verification law, which was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday as part of a comprehensive bill targeting minors’ use of social media.

Kansas Republican Aims to Create New Bureaucracy to 'Investigate' Porn Websites

Republican state legislators succeeded Monday in moving forward Kansas’ version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists, despite serious concerns raised by House Democrats about the cost of establishing a new bureaucracy tasked with investigating websites for pornographic content.

SK Intertainment Launches 'Skinfluential Management' Agency, FansFuel Joint Venture

Mr. Skin/Mr. Man parent company SK Intertainment has launched new creator agency Skinfluential Management, as well as a new joint venture with Showbizz Media's creator stats and affiliate marketing platform, FansFuel.

Industry Attorney, Free Speech Champion Clyde DeWitt Passes Away at 75

Noted industry attorney Clyde DeWitt passed away on Friday in Las Vegas at 75, according to friends and colleagues.

APClips Names Avery Jane 'Creator of the Month'

APClips has named Avery Jane its Creator of the Month for March.

Show More