Germany's Ministry of Justice: Viewing Is Not a Copyright-Infringing Act

BERLIN — Germany's Ministry of Justice, in a judicial declaration yesterday, said that the mere viewing of a copyrighted video stream without permission is not in itself an act of copyright infringement.

The ministry's opinion comes in the wake of a Cologne federal court's decision to review a lower court ruling allowing German law firm Urmann and Colleagues to send as many as 30,000 letters to recipients asking them to settle and pay up for viewing videos on RedTube. The Cologne court said there were "considerable" doubts about the law firm's legal maneuvers.

After receiving the lower court's blessing, Urmann and Colleagues ordered users in Germany to pay €1,000 in compensation for streaming "pirated" videos on as well as legal fees of €150 and investigative costs of up to €250 for streaming movies such as  "Glamour Showgirls" and "Amanda's Secret" that were placed on RedTube.

RedTube, operated by adult entertainment conglomerate MindGeek, fought back, eventually winning an injunction to stop antipiracy lawsuit threats.

According to yesterday's Ministry of Justice’s ruling, the viewing of streamed content that is temporarily cached is legal, whereas downloading a movie stored on a hard drive for later viewing  and reproduction remains illegal.

The opinion by the Ministry of Justice, however, doesn't hold much weight because the question of streaming legality is one yet to be decided in Germany’s highest court.

The federal Ministry of Justice typically devotes itself to creating and changing law in the classic core areas related to Constitutional law.

“Whether the use of streaming offerings constitutes a reproduction or violates the rights of authors and holders of related rights has not yet been clarified by the Supreme Court,” the Ministry told Parliament yesterday.

And whatever the German Supreme Court eventually decides also might not be the last word. The definitive ruling will arrive from outside its borders at the European Court of Justice.

In other copyright infringement news coming out of Germany, the Supreme Court here further pared the legal responsibilities of Internet users when it ruled yesterday that parents are not liable if their adult children use the family Internet connection for file sharing.

The ruling follows a 2012 decision that held parents are not liable for their minor's file sharing, as long as they warned their child that unauthorized downloading and sharing of copyrighted material online is illegal and they were unaware their child violated this prohibition.

The owner of a broadband connection should be able to let his adult family members use the Internet without having to teach them first or monitor their behavior, the court said.

Related:  

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Justices Alito, Thomas Invoke Victorian-Era Morality Law, Raising Censorship Concerns

Several national publications reported this week on widespread concern among Free Speech advocates after U.S. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas repeatedly invoked during a hearing the infamous segregation-era law the Comstock Act, which was the cornerstone of U.S. censorship of sexual material from the 1870s until the 1970s.

Skinfluential Management's FansFuel Acquires Fanwire

Creator stats and affiliate marketing platform FansFuel has acquired creator account management tool Fanwire.

Nebraska AV Bill Moves Forward Despite Privacy, Free Speech Concerns

Nebraska’s unicameral Legislature has given first-round approval to LB 1092, the state’s version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

AEBN Celebrates 25th Anniversary

The Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network (AEBN) is celebrating its 25th year in business this week.

Performers in Meta Blacklisting Lawsuit Seek to Preserve Antitrust Claims

Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby have informed a California court that, although they want to drop their lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, they may still pursue antitrust claims in the future.

FSC, Co-Plaintiffs to Ask US Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Texas Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and its co-plaintiffs in the challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law have petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to stay its recent decision upholding the law, because they intend to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the law’s constitutionality.

FSC Vows to Fight Florida Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has issued a statement vowing to continue fighting Florida’s new age verification law, which was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on Monday as part of a comprehensive bill targeting minors’ use of social media.

Kansas Republican Aims to Create New Bureaucracy to 'Investigate' Porn Websites

Republican state legislators succeeded Monday in moving forward Kansas’ version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists, despite serious concerns raised by House Democrats about the cost of establishing a new bureaucracy tasked with investigating websites for pornographic content.

SK Intertainment Launches 'Skinfluential Management' Agency, FansFuel Joint Venture

Mr. Skin/Mr. Man parent company SK Intertainment has launched new creator agency Skinfluential Management, as well as a new joint venture with Showbizz Media's creator stats and affiliate marketing platform, FansFuel.

Industry Attorney, Free Speech Champion Clyde DeWitt Passes Away at 75

Noted industry attorney Clyde DeWitt passed away on Friday in Las Vegas at 75, according to friends and colleagues.

Show More