Home > News > Ohio 2257 Decision Could Impact FSC Case • Bookmark   • Newsletters   • Register Search Options


Ohio 2257 Decision Could Impact FSC Case

Ohio 2257 Decision Could Impact FSC Case
Get XBIZ News
May 19, 2006 12:36 PM PDT    Text size: 
CLEVELAND, Ohio — A U.S. District Court judge has denied a request from Connection Distributing, publisher of swingers magazines and a website, for injunctive relief against enforcement of 2257 record-keeping regulations. The court also granted summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, ruling that the statute is constitutional.

FSC attorney Reed Lee pointed out that Judge John M. Manos’ decision has no binding authority in the 10th Circuit U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where the FSC filed its case against the U.S. Justice Department regarding 2257, and that the matters on which he ruled are not at the critical to the FSC’s case. But he added that Manos’ decision could nonetheless “help on some points.”

For example, Lee told XBIZ, Manos’ said in relation to Connection’s 5th amendment challenge that 2257 requirements are not targeted at a group likely to be engaged in illegal activity. That decision, he said, opens up serious problems for the government on 1st amendment grounds.

“The question becomes, ‘If the people who have to report the information [under 2257] are not likely to be engaged in crimes, why then are they subjected to the substantial burdens of 2257’s record-keeping requirements,” Lee said.

1st Amendment attorney Larry Walters agreed that the Connection’s ruling could have some bearing on the FSC’s case. And while he said the impact would mostly be to the disadvantage of the industry, it potentially opens up an unforeseen loophole that could benefit operators of adult websites.

“The cases aren’t identical, but similar arguments are being made,” Walter told XBIZ. “Theoretically, the 10th Circuit could look at [the decision] as another rejection of the argument that the statute should be thrown out entirely [on the grounds that it is unconstitutional].”

In its decision, the court looked at multiple related cases presented by Connection, which publishes swingers magazines and a website, as precedent for enjoining enforcement, finding all of them to be irrelevant to the case.

But Walters said one aspect of the decision could have “tremendously far-reaching implications not intended by the judge” that could be “excellent for the industry.”

In its complaint, Connection argued that it would be impossible to meet 2257 requirements for its website because the interior pages are managed by thousands of individual members, with new postings and photographs being added frequently and chat rooms and web cams in constant operation.

Manos rejected this argument on the grounds that 2257 regulations “contain exemptions for providers of web-hosting services and remote computing services who do not, and reasonably cannot, manage the sexually explicit content.”

Manos’ interpretation of the term “web host” to include sites such as Connection’s is the first by any court, and the broadness of his reading of the exemptions is a positive development, according to Walters.

“It’s clear that this judge wanted all of his ruling to be bad for the industry, but not recognizing how websites operate, he opened up a loophole that could present an opportunity for the industry,” Walters said.

Connection Distributing vs. Alberto Gonzales (formerly vs. Janet Reno) dates back to 1995, when Connection Distributing filed suit asking the court to enjoin enforcement of 2257.

In 2000, the court decided in favor of the government. In 2002, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to the U.S. District Court for reconsideration in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The following year, Connection filed an amended complaint to reflect amendments added to the statute. Then, in 2005, Connection petitioned the court for a temporary restraining order against 2257 in anticipation of new regulations scheduled to go into effect June 23 of that year.

More ways to get XBIZ News:  RSS Feeds  |  E-Newsletters  |  Desktop Widget  |  Mobile
Looking for porn star news and behind-the-scene videos? Check out XFANZ.com !


Preventing Legal Problems Before They Start

Dentists typically recommend that a person’s teeth be cleaned every six months and that oral X-rays be taken at least once every year. Internists recommend that a person receive a physical examination... More »

Could Adult Content Be Banned?

Earlier this month, I met with the Free Speech Coalition’s board of directors for our annual review. Despite the headwinds our industry faces, politically and economically, we are, as an organization,... More »

Porn ‘Public Health Crisis’ Is False, Dangerous

We are witnessing the early stages of a moral panic, the likes of which we have not seen since the Reagan Administration. As I write this, there are 27 states in the process of passing mandatory porn... More »
Stay informed of the latest industry developments. Get XBIZ newsletters delivered to your inbox. Subscribe today!
Enter email address:

* To manage existing subscriptions click here.

Submit your press release to
multiple news outlets with 1 click.
Subscribe to RSS news feeds or
add free content to your website.
Access XBIZ news and articles
with your mobile device.
Subscribe to XBIZ Premiere magazine, the industry's leading adult retail trade publications, delivering the most timely and comprehensive business news and information to producers and retailers of adult products.


XBIZ Retreat

May 30 - Jun 03
Miami, Florida

XBIZ Miami 2017

May 30 - Jun 02
Miami, Florida

XShow 18+ 2017

Jun 01 - Jun 03
Moscow, Russia

Cam Summit

Jun 02 - Jun 04
Lloret de Mar, Spain
Everyday thousands of business professionals browse XBIZ's industry directory for quality products and services. Not listed yet? Your company could be losing potential new business. Submit your company today!
Use XBIZ RSS feeds to stay informed of the latest industry developments or as a content syndication tool for your website!