9th Circuit Rules on L.A. Adult Ordinance Case

PASADENA, Calif. — A federal appeals panel has reversed a lower court’s ruling over the city of Los Angeles' attempts to prohibit adult bookstores from operating in the same building as video arcades.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's granting of summary judgment to Alameda Books and Highland Books, two adult bookstores with video arcades that are now joined under the corporate name Beverly Books.

Alameda and Highlands sued the city of Los Angeles in 1995 for freedom-of-speech violations after officials attempted to enforce an ordinance prohibiting combination adult bookstores and video arcades. The ordinance was passed by city council in 1983 to disperse adult-entertainment businesses from Hollywood, Calif., and its purported high crime rates.

The case has seen its days traveling from one courthouse to another, from U.S. District Court to the 9th Circuit to the U.S. Supreme Court, where justices in 2002 decided the limits of a city's power to force adult-themed businesses to be dispersed instead of concentrated in one area.

On Friday, the 9th Circuit reconstitued the case, finding that the lower court, in ruling on the case for the second time, had considered evidence in favor of the bookstores that was obviously biased and unsupported.

To show that stand-alone bookstore and video-arcade portions of the businesses could not survive if forced apart, Alameda and Highland offered the nearly identical testimony of two longtime adult-entertainment industry mavens, William Andrus and Rick Hinckley, both of whom had close ties to the plaintiffs, according to the ruling.

At the time, Andrus and Hinckley testified that separate adult video arcades are virtually nonexistent in the industry.

But the appeals court, meeting at its Pasadena, Calif., chambers, was unconvinced with the testimony, calling the lower court's willingness to overlook the witnesses' bias "a significant oversight."

"Although we have interpreted the Supreme Court’s Alameda Books decision on several occasions, we have yet to hold that a plaintiff has succeeded in 'casting doubt' on the city’s evidence or rationale," the 9th Circuit said in its ruling.

"We are not satisfied that the plaintiffs’ evidence in this case was 'actual and convincing' enough to justify summary judgment — and we emphasize that the procedural posture here was summary judgment," the ruling said.

The panel, 3-0, reversed the lower court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and remanded the case, once again, back to U.S. District Court.

Attorney Clyde DeWitt, who represented Alameda and Highland, told XBIZ he will seek rehearing.

. "The court reversed the summary judgment in our favor and ordered the case to remanded to the district court for trial," he said. .

The case is Alameda Books Inc. vs. City of Los Angeles, No. 09-55367.

Copyright © 2024 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

Justices Alito, Thomas Invoke Victorian-Era Morality Law, Raising Censorship Concerns

Several national publications reported this week on widespread concern among Free Speech advocates after U.S. Supreme Court Justices Samuel Scalia and Clarence Thomas repeatedly invoked during a hearing the infamous segregation-era law the Comstock Act, which was the cornerstone of U.S. censorship of sexual material from the 1870s until the 1970s.

LELO Launches 'Masturbitter' Craft Beer to Promote Male Sex Talk

LELO has partnered with Great Beyond Brewing Company to launch Masturbitter, a craft beer, to encourage men to discuss sex.

Nebraska AV Bill Moves Forward Despite Privacy, Free Speech Concerns

Nebraska’s unicameral Legislature has given first-round approval to LB 1092, the state’s version of the age verification bills being sponsored around the country by anti-porn religious conservative activists.

Performers in Meta Blacklisting Lawsuit Seek to Preserve Antitrust Claims

Adult Performance Artists Guild board officers Alana Evans, Kelly Pierce and Ruby have informed a California court that, although they want to drop their lawsuit claiming that Meta conspired with OnlyFans to blacklist rival premium fan platforms’ talent, they may still pursue antitrust claims in the future.

Xgen Now Shipping ZOLO's 'Stroke Off' Collection

Xgen Products is now shipping the Stroke Off collection of 11 handheld strokers and four masturbators modeled after lifelike body parts.

Nobü Unveils 'Gyrä' Vibrating Grinding Pad

Nobü has introduced the new Gyrä vibrating grinding pad.

Orion Introduces New 3-Motor Vibrator From 'Sweet Smile' Line

Orion Wholesale has debuted the new three-motor RC G- & P-Spot Vibrator from its Sweet Smile line.

C1R Debuts 'Vers' Suction Dildo, Butt Plug

C1R has introduced its new Vers liquid silicone suction dildo and butt plug.

FSC, Co-Plaintiffs to Ask US Supreme Court to Review Constitutionality of Texas Age Verification Law

Free Speech Coalition (FSC) and its co-plaintiffs in the challenge to Texas’ controversial age verification law have petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit to stay its recent decision upholding the law, because they intend to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the law’s constitutionality.

Blush Erotica, The Kinky Candle Company Partner for Branded Candle

Blush Erotica has partnered with The Kinky Candle Company for an official branded candle.

Show More